Propose a concept

Title required

State it as a question where possible.

Cluster required Select one Environment, transport, and margin Single event effects: evidence and requirements System mitigation and board-level testing Evidence transfer, combined effects, and fleet scale None of these

Most closely related existing topic None, this is a new question 1. How much conservatism have we actually accumulated? 2. Statistical solar particle event environments versus historical worst cases 3. When does radiation transport justify reducing a TID requirement? 4. How much radiation design margin is enough? 5. When can high-dose-rate testing satisfy a TID requirement? 6. What constitutes a TID failure in the actual application? 7. How much SEE data is necessary and sufficient? 8. How many devices and lots must we test? 9. Are we applying LET requirements correctly? 10. When is accepting an SEL-sensitive part justified? 11. Can application-specific derating replace blanket exclusion for destructive SEE? 12. How much credit should system mitigation receive? 13. When can board-level proton testing replace additional part testing? 14. When is existing radiation evidence transferable? 15. Are displacement damage and combined-effects requirements appropriately conservative? 16. Does the accepted component risk remain acceptable at system or fleet scale?

The conventional requirement or practice required

What is done today, as specifically as you can state it.

Where the conventional requirement comes from required Select one A published standard or handbook Project or institutional policy Inherited practice without a documented basis A combination Not known

The proposed alternative required

The relaxed, replaced, or restructured requirement. If your position is that the conventional requirement should stand, say so and state why.

The evidence supporting it required

Test data, flight data, analysis, or published work. Cite where you can. "None that I know of" is an acceptable answer.

The conditions under which the alternative would fail required

Environments, technologies, applications, or data gaps that would make the alternative the wrong call.

The data or analysis still needed required

What would have to exist for a project to adopt the alternative at the confidence it would require. This is the knowledge gap.

Would you present this?

Preferred format No preference Invited talk opening a priority discussion Case study Panel question only

Full name required

Email required

Organization required

If accepted, how may this concept be listed in workshop materials? With my name and organization Without attribution Do not list it; use it to inform the program only